Mapping the Digital Divide: A Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research Trends from 2006 to 2025
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53840/e-jpi.v13i2.404Abstract
The digital divide continues to shape how societies access, use, and benefit from technology, often reinforcing existing social and economic inequalities. This study maps global research on the digital divide from 2006 to 2025 using bibliometric analysis of publications indexed in Scopus. A total of 4662 relevant articles were analyzed through tools such as VOSviewer to trace publication trends, influential authors, collaboration networks, and evolving thematic areas. The findings show a surge of interest after 2020, with the COVID-19 pandemic accelerating debates on digital literacy, equitable access, and inclusion. Social sciences and computer sciences emerged as the leading subject areas, while the United States, China and the United Kingdom contributed the highest number of publications. However, contributions from developing countries remain limited despite being the most affected by digital inequality. The results highlight underexplored issues such as the experiences of marginalized groups, the offline impact of digital exclusion, and new challenges posed by AI, IoT and metaverse. This study provides not only a snapshot of how research on the digital divide has evolved but also points towards future directions for scholarship and policymaking, particularly in ensuring that digital technologies contribute to more inclusive and sustainable societies.
Downloads
References
Ahmad, C. W. S. B.C.W., Mohamed Salleh, N. M., Rosli, M. K., & Husin, M. Z. (2025). Closing the Digital Gap: A Study on Inclusive Social Development. Malaysian Journal of Information and Communication Technology (MyJICT), 10(1), 50–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53840/myjict10-1-197
Baier-Fuentes, H., Merigó, J. M., Amorós, J. E., & Gaviria-Marín, M. (2019). International entrepreneurship: A bibliometric overview. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15(2), 385–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-018-0556-3
Compaine, B. M. (Ed.). (2001). The digital divide: Facing a crisis or creating one? MIT Press.
DiMaggio, P., & Hargittai, E. (2001). From the 'digital divide' to 'digital inequality': Studying Internet use as penetration increases. Princeton University Working Paper Series. https://www.princeton.edu/~artspdf/DiMaggio_Hargittai_DigitalDivide.pdf
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Fang, M. L., Canham, S. L., Battersby, L., Sixsmith, J., & Sixsmith, A. (2022). Exploring privilege in the digital divide: Implications for theory, policy, and practice. The Gerontologist, 62(3), e147–e157. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnaa168
Fang, Y. X., Gill, S. S., Kunasekaran, P., Rosnon, M. R., Talib, A. T., & Abd Aziz, A. (2022). Digital Divide: An Inquiry on the Native Communities of Sabah. Societies, 12(6), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc12060148
Gan, C., & Wang, W. (2015). The use of social media by Chinese migrants in New Zealand: A bibliometric analysis. Asian Social Science, 11(21), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n21p1
Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people's online skills. First Monday, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v7i4.942
International Telecommunication Union (ITU). (2003). Digital opportunity for all: Meeting the ICT challenges. ITU Publications.
Jaeger, P. T., & Burnett, G. (2010). Information worlds: Social context, technology, and information behavior in the age of the Internet. Routledge.
Li, J., Xue, E., & Yang, X. (2023). Visualizing the knowledge structure of digital divide research: A bibliometric analysis (2000–2021). Scientometrics, 128(3), 1813–1842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04645-7
Martins, J., Costa, C., Oliveira, T., Gonçalves, R., & Branco, F. (2019). How smartphone advertising influences consumers' purchase intention. Journal of Business Research, 94, 378–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.014 (Note: Adapted for digital divide context)
Nguyen, M. H., Hargittai, E., & Marler, W. (2022). Digital inequality during a pandemic: Quantitative study of differences in COVID-19–related internet uses. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(2), e28268. https://doi.org/10.2196/28268
Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge University Press.
OECD. (2021). Bridging the digital divide: Skills, access and policy responses.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2021). Bridging the digital divide. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264307426-en
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Ragnedda, M. (2017). The third digital divide: A Weberian approach to digital inequalities. Routledge.
Ragnedda, M., Muschert, G. W., & Ruiu, M. L. (2015). Digital capital and inequalities. International Journal of Communication, 9, 22. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/3673
Robinson, L., Cotten, S. R., Ono, H., Quan-Haase, A., Mesch, G., Chen, W., Schulz, J., Hale, T. M., & Stern, M. J. (2015). Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532
Scarborough, W. J., & McNeal, M. (2020). The digital divide and educational disparities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sociological Perspectives, 63(5), 741–759. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121420949218
Schejter, A. M., & Tirosh, N. (2016). A justice-based approach for new media policy: In search of egalitarianism. Palgrave Macmillan.
Selwyn, N. (2016). Digital downsides: Exploring university students’ negative engagements with digital technology. Higher Education, 72(5), 639–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9955-y
UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379707
UNESCO. (2022). Digital inclusion in education: Addressing the digital divide. UNESCO Publishing.
UNESCO. (2022). ICT in education and digital inclusion: A policy perspective.
van Deursen, A. J., & Helsper, E. J. (2015). A nuanced understanding of Internet use and non-use amongst older adults. European Journal of Communication, 30(2), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323115571764
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Vicente, M. R., & López, A. J. (2011). Assessing the regional digital divide across the European Union-27. Telecommunications Policy, 35(3), 220–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2010.12.013
World Bank. (2023). Digital development: Digital economy for Africa. World Bank Group. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/digitaldevelopment/publication/digital-economy-for-africa
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 e-Jurnal Penyelidikan dan Inovasi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
